Engineer and mathematician Walter ReMine has studied evolution thoroughly, examining and researching what the proponents of evolutionary theory actually say. By facing their criticisms of creation, ReMine has built a scientific case for origin by design, using the evolutionist’s terms, conditions, and ground rules. Walter ReMine and University of Northwestern biology professor Dr. Bruce Simat share an important lesson in biology.

Walter has worked in the mathematical fields of signal processing and pattern recognition, in which he holds four patents. His book The Biotic Message has been well received for its novel insights and arguments against evolutionary theory.

Dr. Simat is a beloved associate professor of biology at University of Northwestern, Saint Paul. He played a key role in the well publicized hearings on science standards before the Kansas Board of Education in 2005, and is a leading thinker in the intelligent design movement.

One of the key steps in avoiding confusion in this debate is to define our terms. Walter believes that the evolutionary side has benefited greatly from the way concepts have been incorrectly defined. We look at the real meaning of the term “evolution” itself and of “natural selection”.

Our guests believe that evolutionists are desperate to explain what we see before us in the world. That desire has driven them outside the world of science in an effort to describe it. Meanwhile, creationists have developed the world’s most accurate simulation of population genetics – which, as we hear – has given us results that aren’t compatible with evolution.

Evolutionists continue to face their inability to explain the origin of life. They claim other life forms existed originally, but we can’t find proof of those. There is no evolutionary explanation for the natural formation of even the simplest components of simple organisms.

Highlight: Reluctance

Scientific evidence for creation